Ideas to Improve the Peer Review

@JeryRose

When I do a lot of peer reviews, the products I submit after get passed much faster, within a day or 2, and I'm not vip. But when I haven't done peer reviews in a long time and I do them after I submit my new products, it takes almost over a week for my items to pass no matter how many peer reviews I've done after I submitted them. I think this is to get us in the habit of doing them more on the regular, not just at the exact moment we want them. I think I get it.

As for the extra perk of getting them passed instantly without pr for higher vip? That's literally a luxury perk, which is what VIP is all about anywhere.

Either remove the part in the pr tutorial that tells us to zoom in on GA rated products to check for any exposed red MCG parts under clothing layers or re-train staff to understand this is what they told us to do. I'm sick and tired of being punished for following their rules they don't even know about. Staff does not actually correct the incorrect votes they do when we open help tickets and ask them to review their overriding votes. I don't think it's a personal choice, just that their systems doesn't seem to allow them to. 

Right now I'm skipping products instead of failing them.

I've seen creators get their products taken down when someone reports them for exposing the red mcg zones even by a sliver. So it's unfair that I'm being punished for failing them in pr. Make up your minds on what rules you want so I can follow them.

I say remove the Upper VIPs and put everything back the way it was. We ALL do peer review and push items through. It's blackmail to keep it the way it is. IF you PAY MORE then they pass your products. Pfft. 

DJDaddyWayneWolf

Developers who do peer review can already choose between Promo Credits or Dev Tokens.

Go to your Classic Account Webpage and towards the bottom of the webpage you will find a panel called Creator Preferences that looks like this:

This allows a creator to switch to getting paid with Dev Tokens instead of Promo Credits. Just be aware that a developer only gets 1 Dev Token per product reviewed; 4 more if a product is successfully BUSTED.

I completely agree with your suggestion it’s a very good and much needed one. As creators doing Peer Review, we’re helping maintain the quality of the catalog, and that time and effort should be better rewarded. Instead of just promo credits, we should be getting actual credits or dev tokens so we can keep creating without having to stretch our own resources.

Also, I’m not sure if VIP tier status affects anything in Peer Review, but honestly, it should be fair across the board for everyone who takes the time to participate, regardless of VIP status. Everyone contributing to the process deserves equal recognition and support.

I really hope IMVU listens to this feedback. Thanks again for starting the conversation!

@Darkvogueshop Entiendo que necesitaras abrir un ticket a servicio al cliente para que ellos te dejen saber que fue lo que paso. A veces las sanciones son temporales, hasta 14 dias. Pudieras ser que te tengan el peer review aguantado temporalmente. Tienes que tener mucho cuidado con el articulo que revises, especialmente esos que son AP. Puede ser que una pose este sometida por el creador como GA y en realidad es AP.  Si apruebas la pose como GA  y luego resulta que esta mal evaluada, ahi esta el problema. Espero q esto te haya servido de ayuda. 

Que debo hacer para que me permitan hacer la revision de pares nuevamente, califique 1 producto y me quitaron la revisión 

Perhaps Imvu have no intention of solving the problem at this time because they want to give priority in peer reviews to those who pay for VIP Diamond and Emerald. Which doesn't seem fair to me, especially to those of us who are loyal customers and have old accounts. I've been sponsoring this virtual world for 17 years. We’ll see.

Maybe it's time to figure out how much is a fair wage to pay folk who review products. 

The wage should be based on how much time on average is used to properly review a product type. 

Reviewing some product types should pay more than other product types because those product types take a lot more time and effort to properly review than other types of products.

Until folk get a fair wage then very few will want to review products... maybe nobody.

That problem is right there in your original post. The amount of predits that is earned per review is laughable and always has been. With the amount of time it takes to amass anything worth taking to the catalog, the user is already fatigued with the amount of time they had to invest. 

Another idea is that Gold and Platinum VIP members could receive more promotional credits for participating in peer reviews.